This clip was featured in all the first gen 911 conspiracy films, from Loose Change to 9/11 In Plane Sight, casting the illusion of planes melting into the WTC. Since then Jenny has managed to scrub Google/Youtube from featuring her links to this seismic video of Flight 175.
"Despite the stability of the video camera (it appears to be on a dolly as the picture is almost perfectly horizontal throughout the impact sequence. Not bad for an amateur impromptu video recording...) the UA175 aircraft exhibits a vast amount of motion blur as it penetrates the WTC2 (upper frame) in comparison to frames when the aircraft is on the approach to WTC2 (lower frame). If you study the video you will see that the speed of the aircraft is more or less constant, just as it is in other UA175 videos. This sudden acceleration would have been technically impossible for a Boeing 767-200 under the circumstances.
By now it should be apparent to the reader that the Jennifer Spell video has either been manipulated or is fake. The aircraft seems to have been added to the video using the same technique utilised for the CNN Best Angle Video and the Park Foreman Video. But it's the motion blur error that gives the game away. How could any forger make such an obvious and clumsy mistake? Did they do this on purpose? Was the forger whistle-blowing?
Spell, a Brooklyn resident, claims she received a telephone call from her room mate who told her that an aeroplane had flown into the World Trade Centre. She went outside and began filming the World Trade Centre through what looks like a wire fence (below left) and apparently captured the UA175 aircraft as it struck the south wall of WTC2.
"...just about 5 minutes after I got outside and was shooting, the second plane...circled around and it flew over New Jersey and it came in and just..."
How was Spell able to film the aircraft and watch it at the same time and why don't we see video footage of the aircraft as it "circled around" and "flew over New Jersey"?
From '7 Days In September' - 2002 CameraPlanet Inc. Produced and directed by Steve Rosenbaum.
------------------------------------------------
Despite the 'official' version of events stating that WTC2 was hit by a hijacked Boeing 767-200 there is no photographic evidence to support this. Each picture of the supposed UA175 aircraft analysed in this article shows that some kind of unexplainable defect, be it a 'pod', a defective port wing, lighting anomalies or just an airframe that bears no resemblance to a Boeing 767-200. When the UA175 images are analysed comparatively we see glaring inconsistencies in airspeed, airframe symmetry, lighting, descent path angle and airframe attitude.
Some of these deficiencies are so obvious it is as if their creator wanted us to know that they are fakes. We could call these people "Whistle Blowers". There is the distinct possibility that more than one person or organisation is responsible for manufacturing these fake videos and fake images and that what we are seeing here are the differences between the forging standards of each respective party.
It should be apparent to the reader that the visual record of the WTC2 strike has been fabricated or tampered with to make us believe that the tower was hit by an aircraft. This is the Media Hoax. The question is, by how much has the visual record been manipulated? Are they all fakes or just a proportion of them? It is very hard to tell. In my opinion the figure could be as high as 100%. This means that we effectively have no genuine visual record of the WTC2 strike.
So why is the establishment trying to conceal the true nature of this attack? Why manipulate and / or fabricate the videographic and photographic record of the event? The witness reports offer us an explanation. None of them reported seeing a United Airlines Boeing 767-200 collide with the tower. They all describe something different like a "grey plane" or a "non-commercial plane" or "a plane with no windows" or a "small plane".
The reason why the establishment is trying to conceal the true nature of the WTC2 attack is because there was no United Airlines Boeing 767-200 impact with the WTC2 tower on the morning of 911.
https://hercolano2.blogspot.com/2012/03/911-ua175-jennifer-spell-video.html
"Her video is a forgery. The chain link fence should not be in focus. If you don't believe this than try it yourself. Very, very simple." - https://killtown.blogspot.com/2008/12/jennifer-spell-gets-laser-light-myth.html
