This film explores Enoch Powell's infamous 'Rivers of Blood' speech and the negative result that immigration and forced multiculturalism has had on Britain and it's people since Powell first made the speech. Ubiquitous anti-White violence and media rhetoric, grooming gangs and massive White-erasure are a testament to how well Powell was able to accurately predict the horrid outcome of mass immigration to the UK, as well as the entire White, Western world.
The speech was made by Powell, as a British Member of Parliament, on 20 April 1968, to a meeting of the Conservative Political Centre in Birmingham, United Kingdom. His speech strongly criticised mass immigration and multiculturalism in the United Kingdom.
Internet Bloodsports: Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents Destroys Multiculturalism, Explains Case for Ethno-Nationalism
by Dissident Millennial
BELOW I HAVE transcribed portions of a recent Matthew Drake podcast featuring a debate between Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents Publishing and an internet personality who calls himself “Valid Thought”. The topic of the debate is whether or not America should be a melting pot of various ethnic, racial, and cultural groups, with “Valid Thought” arguing in the affirmative and Greg Johnson arguing — convincingly and devastatingly, in my opinion — in the negative. Regardless, I believe the back-and-forth between these two men provides a remarkable and fascinating commentary on the most existential question facing the West today: the Race Question.
Transcribed portions of video from about 5:30 to 39:30, edited for clarity.
Valid Thought: [Opening Statement] Well as far as my position I think that .. I think everybody here is going to agree that since 1965 we’ve had real problems with diversity as far as with that, we’ve had far too much of it, and that the current mixture of people is going in the wrong direction…
… But I would also argue that there are benefits to diversity that we have enjoyed and do still enjoy as Americans that we never would’ve created or never did create in the ethnostates that we came from. And so, a lot… and a lot of that diversity is what’s allowed the United States to have a broad global appeal, where you know people watch… Anywhere you go in the world people watch American shows, listen to American music, enjoy American culture all over the world everywhere… Nobody does that for like, Polish folk music — the only people who like that are Poles… make sense? So like, because we were so diverse and brought so many people together we were able to create a global culture, which is what makes us, or much of what makes us, so rich and powerful and influential in the world today… And that’s… that’s my valid thought.
Moderator: Ok, Greg do you wanna… give a first thought, a first statement here?
Greg Johnson: Well I just want to respond to the initial statement. I don’t think that it’s… I’m not particularly proud of the popular culture that America exports to the world. I think it’s mostly trash. I think it’s mostly decadent, and I don’t think that that’s a very good argument for diversity. In fact I think that’s an argument against diversity. I would much rather listen to authentic European folk music than basically the products of the American pop culture industry.
So, I just think that this … this argument, this debate, is off to a very, very dead start. I think it’s sort of stillborn if that’s really the best argument that can be made for multiculturalism.
In my opinion multiculturalism for America is a bad idea, and it’s a bad idea in America for the same reason it’s a bad idea anywhere else in the world. Multiculturalism is a source of conflict. It’s a source of conflict and tension, and no serious political thinker throughout the entire history of the West has ever believed that racial or ethnic diversity within the same political order has been a source of strength; it’s always been regarded as a fault line along which a polity can fracture, and to the extent that any kind of diversity was ever allowed, it was always allowed under the condition that either one group be entirely subordinate to another group, or new groups would be assimilated and lose their distinct identities for diversity to come to an end.
I don’t like the idea of cultural genocide against other groups as a condition for them to be part of our polity, and I don’t like the idea of simply dominating and subordinating other groups as a condition for them being within our political system. And so I think that the most equitable and honorable form of government… does not require either cultural domination or cultural genocide against other groups; instead, what we need to do is we need to have separate societies for racially and ethnically distinct people.
Read more:
https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/04/internet-bloodsports-greg-johnson-of-counter-currents-destroys-multiculturalism-explains-case-for-ethno-nationalism/
