Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
Monika Schaeffer~Canada's 319 "Forbidden Thought" Law is Added to Budget Bill-Ending Free Speech
Jan. 19, 2023 Note: Monika reports that 94 year old Ursula Haverbeck is NOT going back to Prison in Germany for ANOTHER year, thanks to HER ability to defeat the ABSURDITY of the Jewish-owned, Kangaroo Court/Cretin "Judge" who tried to imprison her YET AGAIN, for not genuflecting to the Jewish "Thought Police" Cabal who literally OWN EVERY avenue of Power and Influence in modern day Germany. As you will learn from the following interview, the same Jewish-controlled, "Holocaust Denier" Thought Control Legislation that has turned Germany into something far below that of a Banana Republic, will soon reign in earnest in Canada UNLESS enough people wake up to the RAPID decent of Canada into a full blown Jewish-controlled vassal state of Zionist/Talmudic Israel - as seen in Germany today.
Note also: Thanks to Fidel Castro's biological son, Fidelito Trudeau, the "Not withstanding" clause imposed upon the "Rights" outlined in the Canadian constitution, EVISCERATES any "Right" that Canadians mistakenly THINK protects them against tyranny, since the GOVERNMENT can decide what is in "The Public Good " and thus can indict you for ANY "crime" THEY decided you breached, such as "Holocaust Denial" based on your research of Historical FACTS surrounding the events that took place in World War II German Concentration camps.
From Jim Rizoli:
Discussing the VAGUE and AMBIGUOUS HOLOCAUST DENIER Law, deceitfully hidden in the Budget Law proposal.
CANADIAN CRIMINAL CODE 319 ('probably unconstitutional')
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/anti-holocaust-denial-bill-charter-budget-1.6446671
Putting the Holocaust on trial: But Zwibel ("I think it's problematic to criminalize Holocaust denial," said Cara Zwibel, lawyer and director of the Fundamental Freedoms Program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association) warned the legislation could give Holocaust deniers a platform. She cited the case of Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel, who was tried twice in the 1980s for publishing the pamphlet Did Six Million Really Die? The Truth At Last. Although convicted, Zundel was eventually acquitted when the Supreme Court of Canada struck down the country's laws against spreading false news as a violation of free speech. His trials also put the Holocaust on trial, with the crown bringing in Holocaust researchers and survivors to support their case, while the defense put noted Holocaust deniers on the stand. "What being prosecuted did for [Zundel] was give him a big platform and basically allow him to parade a bunch of witnesses in court to try and prove that the Holocaust didn't happen and have the government put survivors before the court. It's atrocious," Zwibel said.
************************
Under section 319(1), everyone who, by communicating statements in a public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of an indictable offense punishable by up to two years’ imprisonment, or of a summary conviction offense.
Section 319(2) makes it an offense to communicate, except in private conversation, statements that willful promote hatred against an “identifiable group” (which has the same meaning as in section 318). As with offenses under section 318, no prosecution under section 319(2) can be instituted without the consent of the Attorney General.
Section 319(7) defines “communicating” to include communicating by telephone, broadcasting or other audible or visible means.33 “Public place” is defined to include any place to which the public has access by right or by invitation, express or implied. “Statements” include words spoken or written or recorded electronically, electromagnetically or otherwise, and also include gestures, signs or other visible representations.
Some of the terms used in these provisions have been further defined by Canadian courts. In a 1990 decision, the Supreme Court said that “‘hatred’ connotes emotion of an intense and extreme nature that is clearly associated with vilification and detestation.” It added:
Category | News & Politics |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.