You can appreciate pornography is demonic. The radically circumcised victim is drawn to pornographic "sex" because of his crippled sex organ. He wants to "fuck" women. Since he was sexually mutilated at birth he has no consciousness of just what was done to him.
From a comment: "I sometimes feel the reason for circumcision is to psychologically hurt boys for some deeper esoteric agenda."
Consider how the newborn baby boy is crucified in the Circumstraint. His legs are spread wide open so his penis can be desecrated. On every level this is incredibly traumatic. Yet still to this day we have respected "pillars of the community" defending this obvious atrocity. They even rub it in your faces when they use foreskin cells to produce high-end beauty creams.
Do you think male sexual mutilation and radical feminism are part of the same agenda?