BIOPOLITICS
AS I PREPARE my remarks for today’s broadcast, last month’s presidential election is still just a bit up in the air, with the lawyers for both sides preparing for further court challenges, so it is remotely possible that the Democrats could take the White House away from the Republicans, although that doesn’t seem likely. What is certain is that this recent electoral circus has been acutely embarrassing to everyone who is stupid enough or naïve enough still to believe, at this late date in the self-destruction of Western civilization, that democracy is a reasonable way for our people to govern themselves.
The Republicans may have taken the prize in this lamentable and undignified contest, but they have very little for which to congratulate themselves, because it is quite clear they can never again win as Republicans: that is, as upholders of the American tradition of independence and self-discipline which Republicans, in the past, claimed to champion. The only way they can win the next election, four years from now, is to continue trying to make themselves indistinguishable from the Democrats, to keep moving to the left, to keep trying to out-Democrat the Democrats.
The old theory was that the country would swing, like a pendulum, from a Republican ascendancy to a Democratic ascendancy and then back again as the mood of the people changed, as economic conditions and the unemployment rate fluctuated. Sometimes the voters would be in a conservative mood, and sometimes they would be in favor of change. Sometimes they would be pleased with the way the government was running the country, and at other times they would blame the government for doing everything wrong and bringing misfortune to the country. This theory postulated a fixed electorate and changing conditions, which caused the prevailing mood of the electorate to change.
What we have now, of course, is a rapidly changing electorate, and that is more important than fluctuating conditions. Until 80 years ago we had a White male electorate. For roughly another 30 or 40 years, even though women were voting from 1920 and were shifting the process to the left, the electorate was still almost completely White. The Second World War, fought in the name of equality and democracy, set the stage for changing all of that. The country was 90 per cent White as late as 1950, and most Blacks still didn’t vote, but the process of change had begun. A massive campaign was underway to move the country further and further to the left, to make it more and more democratic.
Part of this campaign involved elevating the status of the descendants of our former Black slaves to that of the Whites and registering them to vote. Part of it involved changing our immigration laws to cut off the flow of immigrants from Europe — except Jews, of course — and to bring in millions of non-White immigrants from the Third World. Part of it involved organizing and encouraging the growth of various alienated and aggrieved segments of the White population: homosexuals and feminists, for example. And part of it involved enlarging the portion of the electorate dependent on the government for handouts of one sort or another by greatly increasing the number of government welfare programs: food stamps, rent subsidies, medical assistance, and a hundred others.
So now we have a country which is 30 per cent non-White, and that 30 per cent is part of a Democratic coalition which also includes the Jews, the homosexuals, and the feminists, not to mention a substantial minority of Whites who for one reason or another also have joined the coalition. In some cases the reason is simply a bolshevik resentment of people who are more successful. In some cases it is a fashionable sort of liberalism, which is propagated vigorously by the schools, by the Christian churches, and especially by the mass media. And in many cases, especially among the growing segment of the population which is elderly, it is simply a matter of voting for whoever promises them the biggest government handout: something at which the Democrats traditionally have been better.
And this Democratic coalition can only grow, not because of changes in economic conditions or in the mood of the electorate, but because of the changing biology of the electorate. In particular, the country is becoming more non-White with each passing year. The Democrats have been gloating during the past decade that before the end of the first 50 years of this century the United States will have a non-White majority, and that then there will be no way the White race can ever regain control of its own destiny and put a stop to the growth of multiculturalism. Bill Clinton, in particular, has been boasting of this to…
Read more:
https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/01/biopolitics/
