The disconnect is concerning what viruses ACTUALLY ARE/DO -- either dead cellular debris or enzymatic solvents. Which has real scientific evidence supporting it?? Or are these both in the realm of theories posited. What is understood and agreed upon IS that so-called contagion is unsupported by science. I like Jeff's point about healthy eating and the exposing of nutri-ceuticals aka supplementation as 99% unnatural. There may a place for it -- purely using whole-food (organic) based; but health comes from clean air, natural water, real food, activity, and faith (our walk with the LORD).
Jeff seems to affirm the validity of cell cultures as a scientific means of isolating viruses but not as pathogenic agents. I am willing to be convinced by evidence. Viruses as pathogens is completely false.
What did those who espoused the Terrain paradigm of disease and health truly affirm based on science and not cultic beliefs as Jeff puts it "it stand to reason that" -- that proves nothing.
Much of what he affirms are merely dogmatic assertions with no actual scientific evidence. Some affirmations from both camps are religious and not scientific in nature.
He, Jeff states that he has established these scientific facts based on his research .. unless his research is based on actual scientific experimentation with controls and based on the scientific method.. it is conjecture and not science and what he is affirming then is certainly NOT ESTABLISHED scientific fact, but his belief or opinion or UNESTABLISHED hypothesis.
It is time to revisit the actual writings of some of these pioneers of "real" science.
Antoine Bechamp
Gaston Naessens
Gunther Enderlein
Claude Bernard
Raymond Royal Rife
Stefan Lanka
Claus Kohnlein
UPDATES & Critical Analysis:
I have reviewed Jeff Green's article/book "Age of Deception"
He puts words in Bechamp's mouth. Antoine Bechamp never referred to these particles as "viruses".. or "viruses" as enzymatic solvents.. and for that matter neither do any of the Terrain pioneers:- Bechamp, Enderlein, Bernard, Naessens, Rife, etc.
Enzymes indeed are protein based solvents .. BUT .. "viruses" which do not exist are NOT Enzymes or solvents.. they are cellular debris. and computer based fabrications and fiction.
This theory is Jeff's alone.. and is just that, a hypothesis that is science fiction and not science fact.
It is most likely for this reason that he is not accepted into Kaufman's company. I too would not waste my time or energy arguing with Jeff either.
So called "viruses" are cellular debris. With the understanding that what are called "giant viruses" as discovered in sea algae have in fact been isolated and have a single identical genome sequence (the same every time) -- there are no variants. Variants are cellular debris from dead and dying tissue. (non-living particles and cannot rightly be called microbes or microorganisms)
Cell culture experiments are not isolating any so-called viruses .. but starving and poisoning tissues and the resultant decaying of cells the fraudsters are asserting are "viruses". They are blaming the maggots on the rotting corpse for killing the body.
What these pioneers discovered were a unit of life smaller than cells, bacteria, and smaller than exosomes ( at various stages in their pleomorphic cycle ) .. these microbes are living organisms and a particular cycle based on the inner terrain. THEY are not viruses (non-living) .. They are alive. [Microzymas, Somatids]
Jeff, imhho is hijacking language like the deceivers in order to redeem the terminology of a "virus" but gives this term a new definition; one of his making and not established by science. This is plain confusion.
"Virus" as defined by virology is science fiction and so too is Jeff Green's notion of a "virus" -- just that a story or hypothesis that has no basis in scientific fact or reality.
RESOURCES:
150 Years of Hidden Knowledge
http://www.whale.to/p/bird.html
https://adistantmirror.com/to-be-or-not-to-be-150-years-of-hidden-knowledge/
ATTRIBUTION:
Jeff Green
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/IfkoQ5D4O47G/
